I was in Ann Cannon’s WIFYR workshop last month. She offered
plenty of advice on the craft and among the gems, she shared how she revises a
novel.
The first thing she does is print out a copy of the story.
She puts it in a three-ring binder then celebrates that she has a book. Good in
and of itself. We need to pat ourselves on the back whenever we can.
At this point, she puts it away for a few weeks. This is so
when she returns to it, she comes back at it with fresh eyes.
Next – and this is important - she checks into a motel for a
day or two just to read the story. Got to get away from the day-to-day
interruptions – family, friends, the garden, chores – half finished chores, chores
not started, etc.
In the motel, armed with colored sticky notes, Ann reads the
book several times through. She has a different purpose with each pass over.
She reads looking at plot, to see if the story makes sense. Are there gaps in
logic? Is it is moving forward in a logical manner? Does one chapter lead to
the next? Do readers want to find out what happens next? At WIFYR, Ann spoke of
grounding the characters in the space/time continuum, which she looks at her
initial reading as well.
With a different colored sticky, Ann reads again,
concentrating on her characters, asking questions as she goes. How soon do
readers learn names, age, and gender of the main characters? Do we know what
they want and have a sense of what is preventing them? She looks at the minor
characters. Are they distinct in name and personality? Do you have too many of
them and if so, can you combine them into fewer? For major and minor
characters, are their motivations consistent and realistic? Do they have
purpose other than to just to move the plot?
Another reading and Ann looks at setting. Does she have
enough physical description to give a sense of place? Does she maximize setting
to create mood or to tell about the characters. Has she engaged the readers’
senses?
Then Ann reads just for language, to insure clarity of
meaning and intention with a rule of thumb: precision first, flowery words
second. Is she saying things the best way possible? Has she avoided passive
language?
Great advice. Wish I had followed it. I have been 99.9 % finished
with a project the four months. I’m tired of it and want to get it into
publishers’ hands soon. I did not shelve it for weeks. I didn’t do the
different colored stickies, nor read it several times. Probably should have
checked into a motel for a few days, too. There’s way too many things going on
that interrupt the flow of analyzing a story.
1 comment:
Ann is great! I love this coded, careful, methodical way of reviewing--uninterrupted. GREAT reminder to slow down and follow one line of structure throughout the piece, rather than trying to take in the whole at once.
Post a Comment